Focal hot spot induced by a central subclavian line on bone scan

Authors
Masood Moslehi 1
Mohsen Cheki 2
Tohid Dehghani 1
Mansoureh Eftekhari 3
1 Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Fars, Iran
Abstract
The diagnostic accuracy of nuclear medicine reporting can be improved by awareness of these instrument-related artifacts. Both awareness and experience are also important when it comes to detecting and identifying normal (and abnormal) variants. We present a case of hot spot on the upper right chest in the region of right subclavicular region resulting from injection of radiotracer from central subclavian line. A 52-year-old woman with a history of left breast cancer and recent bone pain was referred to our nuclear medicine department for skeletal survey. Anterior views of chest show a focus of increased radiotracer uptake corresponding to anterior arch of one of the right second rib. The nuclear physician reported it as a focal rib bony lesion and recommended radiological evaluation. As technician later explained, physicians realized that injection site was a central subclavian line on the right side and hot spot on that region is due to injection site. The appearance of both skeletal and soft-tissue uptake depends heavily on imaging technique (such as the route of radiotracer administration) and the interpreting physicians should be aware of the impact of technical factors on image quality.

Keywords

1.
Howarth D. Patient-related pitfalls and artifacts in nuclear medicine imaging. Semin Nucl Med 1996;26:295-307.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Eftekhari M, Gholamrezanezhad A. Unusual misplacement of a subclavian vein catheter detected on a bone scan. Rev Esp Med Nucl 2006;25:117.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Loutfi I, Collier B, Mohammed A. Nonosseous abnormalities on bone scans. J Nucl Med Technol 2003;31:149-53. quiz 154-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mirpour S, Fallahi B, Gholamrezanezhad A. Fecal impaction detection on a bone scan. Rev Esp Med Nucl 2006;25:327-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Andrews A, Theocheung L, Andrews E, Tyler K. Unintentional intra-arterial injection of a bone-imaging agent. Clin Nucl Med 1980;5:499-501.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Thrall J, Ghaed N, Geslien G, Pinsky S, Johnson M. Pitfalls in Tc-99m polyphosphate skeletal imaging. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1974;121:739-47.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kobayashi K. short-time SPECT images of bone scintigraphy improve the diagnostic value in the evaluation of solitary lesions in the thoracic spine in patients with extraskeletal malignancies? Ann Nucl Med 2005;19:557-66.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Yui N. Usefulness of bone SPECT of the cervical spine: With special reference to separate visualization of the trachea and thyroid cartilage. Ann Nucl Med 1993;7:223-30.  Back to cited text no. 8
Advanced Biomedical Research
Volume 2014, November
November 2014
Pages 1-2