Effects of gamma irradiation on microbial load and quality characteristics of veal

Authors
Ebrahim Rahimi 1
Reza Faghihi 2
Milad Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi 3
Ali Alavaian-Ghavanini 2
Hamid Reza Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi 4
Zahra Siavashpour 5
Afrouz Farshadi 2
Farzad Rafie 6
1 Department of Food Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Islamic Azad University of Shahr e kord, Shahr e kord, Iran
2 Department of Medical Radiation Engineering and Radiation Research Center, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
3 Department of Medical Physics and Medical Engineering, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4 Department of Molecular Medicine and Reproductive Endocrinology Research Center, Shahid Beheshty University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5 Department of Medical Radiation Engineering, Shahid Beheshty University, Tehran, Iran
6 Private Veterinarian, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Background: Veal is a rich nutrient medium that provides a suitable environment for proliferation of veal spoiling microorganisms and common food-borne pathogens. In this study, the effects of irradiation on the veal microbiological quality and half life of minced beef during chilled storage was investigated. Materials and Methods: Twenty samples of minced veal were irradiated with doses of 2, 5, 7, and 10 kGy (Cobalt-60, gamma cell 220) and evaluated for their microbiological quality up to 10 days. Results: The results showed that gamma irradiation reduced the number of microorganisms in all the irradiated minced veal samples, with 2, 5, 7, and 10 kGy (P < 0.01). Moreover, the half life of the samples were increased considerably (P < 0.01). In addition, the results indicated that there was a significant difference in the number of coliformes between untreated and irradiated samples (P < 0.05). While, Staphylococcus aureus could not be detected in the irradiated samples with doses of 7 and 10 kGy. Conclusion: These results indicated that irradiation could be employed as an effective mean to inactivate common food-borne pathogens namely S. aureus and increases the half life of veal.
Keywords
Gamma irradiation
veal
microbial quality
1. Al-Sheddy L, Al-Dagal M, Bazarra WA. Microbial and sensory quality of fresh camel meat treated with organic acid salts and/or biofidobacteria. Journal of Food Science 2004;64:336-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2. Coleby B. The effects of irradiation on the quality of meat and poultry. Int J Appl Radiat Isot 1959;6:115-21.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3. Mayer-Miebach E, Stahl MR, Eschrig U, Deniaud L, Ehlermann DA, Schuchmann HP. Inactivation of a non-pathogenic strain of E. coli by ionising radiation. Food Control 2005;16:701-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4. Unluturk S, Atilgan MR, Baysal AH, Tari C. Use of UV-C radiation as a non thermal process for liquid egg products (LEP). Journal of Food Engineering 2007;85:561-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5. Dogbevi MK, Vachon C, Lacroix M. Physicochemical and microbiological changes in irradiated fresh pork loins. Meat Sci 1999;51:349-54.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6. Davis KJ, Sebranek JG, Huff-Lonergan E, Ahn DU, Lonergan SM. The effects of irradiation on quality of injected fresh pork loins. 2004:67:395-401.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7. Borsa J, Lacroix M, Ouattara B, Chiasson F. Radiosensitization: Enhancing the radiation inactivation of food borne bacteria. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 2004;71:137-41.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8. Unluturk S, Atilgan MR, Baysal AH, Tari C. Use of UV-C radiation as a non thermal process for liquid egg products (LEP). Journal of Food Engineerin 2007;85:561-68.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9. Aymerich T, Picouet PA, Monfort JM. Decontamination technologies for meat products. Meat Sci 2008;78:114-29.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10. Iranian national standard no. 5272. Microbiology of food items and domestic animal feed. The Total Numeration Method of Microorganisms in 30 centigrade's degree. 2000.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11. Iranian national standard no. 437. Separation, identification and total 4 numeration of forms. 1995.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12. Iranian national standard no. 1194. The method of identifying and numerating coagolas Staphylococcus aureus (+) used for food items. 1987.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13. Dogbevi MK, Vachon C, Lacroix M. The effect of gamma irradiation on physicochemical and microbiological quality of fresh pork loins. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 2000;57:261-3.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14. Sweetie RK, Ramesh E, Arun S. Effect of radiation processing on the quality of chilled meat products. Meat Science. 2005:69:269-75.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15. Al-Bachir M, Zeinou R. Effect of gamma irradiation on microbial load and quality characteristics of minced camel meat. Meat Sci 2009; [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16. Kiss IF, Beczner Z, Zachariev G, Kovacs S. Irradiation of meat products, chicken and use of irradiated spices for sausages. International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation1990;36:295-99.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17. Kanatt SR, Chander R, Sharma A. Effect of radiation processing on the quality of chilled meat products. Meat Sci 2005;69:269-75.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18. Carrasco A, Tárrega R, Ramírez MR, Mingoarranz FJ, Cava R. Colour and lipid oxidation changes in dry-cured loins from free-range reared and intensively reared pigs as affected by ionizing radiation dose level. Meat Sci 2005;69:609-15.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19. Sommers C, Boyd G. Variation in the radiation sensitivity of food-borne pathogens associated with complex ready-to-eat food products. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 2006;75:773-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20. Badr HM. Elimination of Escherichia coli O 157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes from raw beef sausage by gamma-irradiation. Mol Nutr Food Res 2005;49:343-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21. Farkas J. Irradiation as a method for decontaminating food. A review. Int J Food Microbiol 1998;44:189-204.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
Advanced Biomedical Research
Volume 2013, March
March 2013
Pages 1-5