Ultrasonography in distinguishing optic neuritis from nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy

Authors

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Isfahan Eye Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Radiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Deparment of Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 Medical Students Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Optic neuritis (ON) and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) have some overlapping clinical profiles. We evaluated the usefulness of B-scan ultrasonography in distinguishing ON from NAION by measuring diameter of the optic nerve.
Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with an acute noncompressive unilateral optic neuropathy with relative afferent pupillary defect and onset of visual loss during the last 2 weeks were included. Diagnosis of ON was based on age ≤ 35 years, orbital pain associated with eye movement, and no disk edema, and diagnosis of NAION was based on age ≥ 60 years, no orbital pain associated with eye movement, and presence of disk edema. Age- and gender-matched subjects without ocular disease were selected for comparison. The diameter of the optic nerve was measured by a single radiologist with B-scan ultrasonography.
Results: In ON patients, the mean diameter of the affected nerve was significantly larger than that of the unaffected nerve and also larger than that of the right nerve of young controls; P < 0.05. In NAION patients, however, there was no significant difference between the mean diameter of the affected nerve and of the unaffected nerve or the right nerve of elderly controls; P > 0.05. Also, the diameter of the affected nerve was significantly larger in ON than in AION patients; P < 0.05.
Conclusion: B-scan ultrasonography is helpful in the early stages of optic neuropathy to distinguish ON from NAION in those cases for which the diagnosis is still uncertain after clinical evaluation.

Keywords

1. Smith CH. Optic neuritis. In: Miller NR, Newman NJ, Biousse V, et al, editors. Walsh and Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004. p. 294-347.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2. Arnold AC. Ischemic Optic Neuropathy. In: Miller N R, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Walsh and Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004. p. 350-83.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3. Purvin V, Kawasaki A. Neuro-ophthalmic emergencies for the neurologist. Neurologist 2005;11:195-233.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4. Warner JE, Lessell S, Rizzo JF 3rd, Newman NJ. Does optic disc appearance distinguish ischemic optic neuropathy from optic neuritis? Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:1408-10.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5. Gerling J, Meyer JH, Kommerell G. Visual field defects in optic neuritis and anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: Distinctive features. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998;236:188-92.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6. Rizzo JF 3rd, Lessell S. Optic neuritis and ischemic optic neuropathy. Overlapping clinical profiles. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1668-72.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7. Optic Neuritis Study Group. The clinical profile of optic neuritis. Experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1673-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8. Gerling J, Janknecht P, Hansen LL, Kommerell G. Diameter of the optic nerve in idiopathic optic neuritis and in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Int Ophthalmol 1997;21:131-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9. Preechawat P, Bruce BB, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in patients younger than 50 years. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:953-60.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10. Hayreh SS, Joos KM, Podhajsky PA, Long CR. Systemic diseases associated with nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;118:766-80.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11. Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial Study Group. Characteristics of patients with nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy eligible for the Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:1366-74.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12. Swartz NG, Beck RW, Savino PJ, Sergott RC, Bosley TM, Lam BL, et al. Pain in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. J Neuroophthalmol 1995;15:9-10.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Spurr JO, Beck RW. Baseline visual field profile of optic neuritis. The experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Optic Neuritis Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:231-4.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14. Gass A, Moseley IF, Barker GJ, Jones S, MacManus D, McDonald WI, et al. Lesion discrimination in optic neuritis using high resolution fatsuppressed fast spin echo MRI. Neuroradiology 1996;38:317-21.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15. Dees C, Buimer R, Dick AD, Atta HR. Ultrasonographic investigation of optic neuritis. Eye 1995;9:488-94.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16. Miller DH, Newton MR, van der Poel IC, du Boulay EP, Halliday AM, Kendall BE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve in optic neuritis. Neurology 1988;38:175-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17. Gans MS, Byrne SF, Glaser JS. Standardized A-Scan echography in optic nerve disease. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1232-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18. Howard CW, Osher RH, Tomsak RL. Computed tomography features in optic neuritis. Am J Ophthalmol 1980;89:699-702.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19. Lystad LD, Hayden BC, Singh AD. Optic nerve disorders. Ultrasound Clin 2008;3:257-66.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20. Rizzo JF 3rd, Andreoli CM, Rabinov JD. Use of magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate optic neuritis and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1679-84.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21. Hayden BC, Kelley L, Singh AD. Ophthalmic ultrasonography: Theoretic and practical considerations. Ultrasound Clin 2008;3:179-83.  Back to cited text no. 21