Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy: Extended mallampati score versus the MMT, ULBT and RHTMD

Safavi, Mohammadreza; Honarmand, Azim; Amoushahi, Mahsa

Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy: Extended mallampati score versus the MMT, ULBT and RHTMD

Authors

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Preoperative using of anatomical landmarks detects potentially difficult laryngoscopies. The main object of the present study was to evaluate the predictive power of Extended Mallampati Score (EMS) in comparison with modified Mallampati test (MMT), the ratio of height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) and the Upper-Lip-Bite test (ULBT) in isolation and combination.
Materials and Methods: Four hundred seventy sixadult patients who candidate for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation were included in this study and evaluated based of all four factors before surgery. This study was randomized prospective double - blind. After that, laryngoscopy was performed by an anesthesiologist who didn't involve in preoperative airway assessment and graded based on Cormack and Lehane's classification. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) (AUC) for each score.
Results: The AUCof the ROC was significantly more for the ULBT (AUC = 0.820, P = 0.049) and RHTMD score (AUC = 0.845, P = 0.033) than the EMS (AUC = 0.703). This variable was significantly higher for the EMS compared with MMT (0.703 vs. 0.569, P = 0.046 respectively). There was no significant difference between the AUC of the ROC for the ULBT and the RHTMD score (P = 0.685).The optimalcut-off point for the RHTMD for predicting difficult laryngoscopy was 29.3.
Conclusion: EMS predicted difficult laryngoscopy better than MMT while both ULBT and RHTMD had more power than EMS and MMT in this regard. ULBT and RHTMD had similar predictive value for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in general population.

Keywords

References

1.	Tiret L, Desmonts JM, Hatton F, Vourch G. Complications associated with anaesthesia-a prospective survey in France. Can Anaesth Soc J 1986;33 (3 Pt 1):336-44.
2.	Zuercher M, Ummenhofer W. Cardiac arrest during anesthesia. Curr Opin Crit Care 2008;14:269-74.
3.	Braz LG, Módolo NS, do Nascimento P Jr, Bruschi BA, Castiglia YM, Ganem EM, et al. Perioperative cardiac arrest: A study of 53,718 anaesthetics over 9 yr from a Brazilian teaching hospital. Br J Anaesth 2006;96:569-75.
4.	Arndt M, Benad G.The risks of anesthesia in obstetric interventions.Anaesthesiol Reanim 1994;19:88-94.
5.	Bolander FM. Deaths associated with anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1975;47:36-40.
6.	Iohom G, Ronayne M, Cunningham AJ.Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003;20:31-6.
7.	Davis DA. An analysis of anesthetic mishaps from medical liability claims. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1984;22:31-42. [PUBMED]
8.	Mchugh R, Kumar M, Sprung J, Bourke D.Transtracheal jet ventilation in management of the difficult airway. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007;35:406-8.
9.	Mallampati SR. Clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation (hypothesis). Can Anaesth Soc J 1983;30:316-7. [PUBMED]
10.	Samsoon GL, Young JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: A retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987;42:487-90. [PUBMED]
11.	Khan ZH, Kashfi A, Ebrahimkhani E. A comparison of the upper lip bite test (a simple new technique) with modified mallampati classification in predicting difficulty in endotracheal intubation: A prospective blinded study.Anesth Analg 2003;96:595-9. [PUBMED]
12.	Lewis M, Keramati S, Benumof JL, Berry CC. What is the best way to determine oropharyngeal classification and mandibular space length to predict difficult laryngoscopy? Anesthesiology 1994;81:69-74.
13.	Mashour GA, Sandberg WS. Craniocervical extension improves the specificity and predictive value of the Mallampati airway evaluation. Anesth Analg 2006;103:1256-9.
14.	Mashour GA, Kheterpal S, Vanaharam V, Shanks A, Wang LY, Sandberg WS, et al. The extended Mallampati score and a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus are predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in the morbidly obese. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1919-23.
15.	Krobbuaban B, Diregpoke S, Kumkeaw S, Tanomsat M. The predictive value of the height ratio and thyromental distance: Four predictive tests for difficult laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1542-5.
16.	Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Friberger D, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: A prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985;32:429-34.
17.	Butler PJ, Dhara SS. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy: An assessment of thyromental distance and Mallampati predictive tests. Anaesth Intensive Care 1992;20:139-42.
18.	Schmitt HJ, Kirmse M, Radespiel-Troger M. Ratio of patient's height to thyromental distance improves prediction of difficult laryngoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002;30:763-5.
19.	Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984;39:1105-11. [PUBMED]
20.	Rose DK, Cohen MM. The airway: Problems and predictions in 18500 patients. Can J Anaesth 1994;41:372-83.
21.	Arne J, Descoins P, Fusciardi F, Ingrand P, Ferrier B, Boudigues D, et al. Preoperative assessment for difficult laryngoscopy in general and ENT surgery: Predictive value of a clinical multivariate risk index. Br J Anaesth 1998;80:140-6.
22.	Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, Guggiari M, Bianchi A, Coriat P, et al. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1229-36.
23.	Oates JD, Macleod AD, Oates PD, Pearsall FJ, Howie JC, Murray GD. Comparison of two methods for predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 1991;66:305-9.

Advanced Biomedical Research