Authors
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Biostatistics, Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Background: Studies have shown significant correlation between time to pregnancy (TTP) and pregnancy outcomes. But understanding of these mechanisms may not be facilitated. The aim of this study was to determine the relation between TTP and pregnancy outcome.
Materials and Methods: This study was a case cohort study that was done in Shahid Beheshti Educational Hospital during 2006-2007. Women aged 18-35 years, who had only one pregnancy without using any contraception method before pregnancy and delivered their first child, were enrolled in this study. Thus, 801 women were selected and followed up for pregnancy outcome and TTP until the end of pregnancy. All the participants filled in a special questionnaire. Finally the collected data were entered into computer and analyzed by SPSS ver. 20 software.
Results: The frequency distribution of TTP-based pregnancy outcome showed that TTP >48 weeks was higher in normal delivery than in abnormal delivery (5.6% vs. 19.4%). According to Chi-square test, the frequency distribution of pregnancy outcome was related to TTP (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, there is a significant relationship between TTP and pregnancy outcome, and TTP may lead to unwanted complications such as ectopic pregnancy, preterm labor, and abortion. Thus, all women with a long time of contraception, especially in the rural areas, mast be controlled.
Keywords
1. | Weinberg R, Gladen BC. The beta-geometric distribution applied to comparative fecundability studies. Biometrics 1986;42:547-60. |
2. | Joffe M, Key J, Best N, Keiding N, Scheike T, Jensen TK: Studying time to pregnancy by used of a retrospective design. Am J Epidemiol 2005;1622:115-24. |
3. | Raatikainen K, Harju M, Hippelainen M, Heinonen S. Prolonged time to pregnancy is associated with a greater risk of adverse outcomes. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1148-51. |
4. | Luke B, Brown MB. Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age. Hum Report 2007;22:1264-72. |
5. | Henriksen TB, Baird DD, Olsen J, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ, Wilcox AJ. Time to pregnancy and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:594-9. |
6. | Joffe M, Li Z. Association of time to pregnancy and the outcome of pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1994;62:71-5. |
7. | Caughey AB, Stotland NE, Washingtom AE, Escobar GJ. Who is at risk for prolonged and postterm pregnancy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:683e1-5. |
8. | Schaumburg I, Boldsen JL. Waiting time to pregnancy and pregnancy outcome among Danish workers in the textile, clothing, and footwear industries. Scand J Soc Med 1992;20:110-4. |
9. | Axmon A, Hagmar L. Time to pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. Fertile Steril 2005;84:966-74. |
10. | Axmon A, Rylander L, Albin M, Haqmar L. Factors affecting time to pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2006;21:279-84. |
11. | Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G. Time to pregnancy: Results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reorod 2003;18:1959-66. |
12. | Jukic AM, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, McConnaughey Dr, Wilcox AJ. Length of human pregnancy and contributors to its natural variation. Hum Report 2013;28:2848-55. |
13. | Bello B, Kielkowski D, Heederik D, Wilson K. Time-to-pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes in a South African population. BMC Public Health 2010;10:565. |