Microbial quality survey of sunscreen products in Iranian market

Authors
Behnoosh Haftbaradaran 1
Daryoush Abedi 1
Mohammad Jalali 2
Mohammad Reza Bagherinejad 1
1 Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Food science, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Background: Microbial contamination of cosmetic products is very crucial because of their daily use and direct contact with the skin. These products are at high risk for microbial contamination from various sources such as environment, consumer's hands, body sweat and during the time of manufacturing. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the microbial quality of sunscreens products, manufactured in or imported to or formulated in local pharmacies in Iran.
Materials and Methods: The microbial quality were determined in three different levels; the intact product (at the time of purchase) and after three and after six months of opening it. Total Aerobic Viable Count (TAVC) and the presence of coliforms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, molds, and yeasts were studied.
Results: At the time of purchase, 40, 73.3 and 43.3 percentage of Iranian made, imported and pharmacy formulated sunscreens were contaminated with at least one of the objectionable microorganisms, respectively. After three months of opening it, 36.6, 70 and 46.6 percentage of Iranian made, imported and pharmacy formulated sunscreens were contaminated with at least one of the objectionable microorganisms, respectively. The percentages of contaminated samples were 36.6, 70 and 50 after six months of opening for Iranian made, imported and pharmacy formulated sunscreens, respectively.
Conclusion: Microbial contamination of these sunscreens products is a potential health risk for consumers. It seems that it is necessary to inspect and monitor the products during the manufacturing and shelf life period. It is highly recommended to control and regulate cosmetic products by health organizations to ensure the quality and safety of this kind of products.

Keywords

1. Templeton K, Gripentrog E, Hellwig T. Shining the Light on Sunscreen. US Pharm 2012;37:36-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2. Jemec GB, Renneberg J, Wulf HC. Microbiology of sunscreens in use. Occupat Envir Dermatosen 1997;45:275-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3. Baird M, Bloomfield S. Microbial Quality Assurance in Cosmetics, Toiletries and Non-Sterile Pharmaceuticals, 2 nd ed. London: Taylor and francis Ltd; 1996. p. 3-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4. Kabara J, Orth D. Preservative-free and self-preserving cosmetics and drugs. In: Kabara JJ, Orth DS, editors. Principlesfor Product Preservation. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997. p. 1-14.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5. Behravan J, Bazzaz F, Malaekeh P. Survey of bacteriological contamination of cosmetic creams in Iran (2000). Int J Dermatol 2005;44:482-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6. Wedderburn DL. Preservation of emulsions against microbial attack. In: Bean AH, Beckett JE, Carless HS, editors. Advances in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 1. London: Academic Press; 1964. p. 195-268.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7. Claussen C. An investigation of bacterial growth in generic versus brand name lotions and shampoos over a 2 week period. SMU Bio J 2007:1-21.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8. Wong S, Street D, Delgado SI, Klontz KC. Recalls of foods and cosmetics due to microbial contamination reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. J Food Prot 2000;63:1113-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9. Lundov M, Zachariae C. Recalls of microbiologically contaminated cosmetics in EU from 2005 to May 2008. Int J Cosmet Sci 2008;30:471-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10. Gong JQ, Lin L, Lin T, Hao F, Zeng FQ, Bi ZG, et al. Skin colonization by Staphylococcus aureus in patients with eczema and atopic dermatitis and relevant combined topical therapy: A double-blind multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol 2006;155:680-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11. Lundov M, Moesby L, Zachariae C, Johansen J. Contamination versus preservation of cosmetics: A review on legislation, usage, infections, and contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2009;60:70-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12. Lintner K, Genet V. A physical method for preservation of cosmetic products. Int J Cosmet Sci 1998;20:103-15.   Back to cited text no. 12
    
13. Draelos Z, Thaman L. Cosmetic formulation of skin care products. Cosmetic science and technology series, Vol. 30. Arizona: Jungermann Associates, Inc 2006;30:9-10.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14. Lundov M, Johansen J, Zachariae C, Moesby L. Creams Used by Hand Eczema Patients are often Contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus. Acta Derm Venereol 2012;92:1-2.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15. Anonymous. Guide to inspections of cosmetic product manufacturers. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. USA, Silver Spring MD: FDA; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16. Varvaresou A, Papageorgiou S, Tsirivas E, Protopapa E, Kintziou H, Kefala V, et al. Self-preserving cosmetics. Int J Cosmet Sci 2009;31:163-75.   Back to cited text no. 16
    
17. Anonymous. Microbiological limit guidelines for cosmetics and toiletries. Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association guidelines. USA, Washington DC: CTFA; 1973.  Back to cited text no. 17
Advanced Biomedical Research
Volume 2014, August
August 2014
Pages 1-6