Impact of sperm chromatin evaluation on fertilization rate in intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Moslehi, Masood; Cheki, Mohsen; Iranpour, Farhad Golshan

Impact of sperm chromatin evaluation on fertilization rate in intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Authors

¹ Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

² Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

³ Department of Anatomical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Sperm DNA in human beings and most vertebrates is packed by protamines into highly compact form of chromatin. There are many staining methods to assess sperm chromatin. Three different methods of staining were used simultaneously in this study and the goal was to determine which of these sperm tests has a relation with fertilization rate in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
Materials and Methods: Thirty couples who referred to Yamagata University Hospital (Yamagata, Japan) for ICSI were included in this study. The greater part of semen was prepared for ICSI. The remaining part was used for staining with aniline blue, acridine orange, and chromomycin A3 (CMA3). For evaluation of abnormal morphology and abnormality of head, Papanicolaou-stained smears were used. The analysis of data was done using Spearman coefficient of correlation and logistic regression model. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used for discrimination of CMA3 staining power to identify ICSI rates.
Results: Percentage of CMA3 positivity, unlike those of aniline blue and acridine orange, showed significant negative correlation with fertilization rate. Moreover, the percentage of CMA3 positivity showed a positive correlation with the percentage of abnormal morphology and abnormality of head. By dividing patients into CMA3 <48% and CMA3> 48% groups, the area under the curve was 0.646.
Conclusions: CMA3 staining (protamine deficiency) could be considered as a useful tool for evaluation of male fertility prior to infertility treatment.

Keywords

References

1.	World Health Organization: Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucous Interaction. 3 ^rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
2.	Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FS, Lombard CJ, Van der Merwe JP, van Zyl JA, et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986;46:1118-23.
3.	Erenpreiss J, Spano M, Erenpreisa J, Bungum M, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure and male fertility: Biological and clinical aspects. Asian J Androl 2006;8:11-29.
4.	Leahy T, Gadella BM. Sperm surface changes and physiological consequences induced by sperm handling and storage. Reproduction 2011;142:759-78.
5.	Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992;340:17-8.
6.	Van Steirteghem AC, Liu J, Joris H, Nagy Z, Janssenwillen C, Tournaye H, et al. Higher success rate by intracytoplasmic sperm injection than by subzonal insemination. Report of a second series of 300 consecutive treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1055-60.
7.	Foresta C, Zorzi M, Rossato M, Varotto A. Sperm nuclear instability and staining with aniline blue: Abnormal persistence of histones in spermatozoa in infertile men. Int J Androl 1992;15:330-7.
8.	Tejada RI, Mitchell JC, Norman A, Marik JJ, Friedman S. A test for the practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertil Steril 1984;42:87-91.
9.	Sakkas D, Urner F, Bizzaro D, Manicardi G, Bianchi PG, Shoukir Y, et al. Sperm nuclear DNA damage and altered chromatin structure: Effect on fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod 1998;13 Suppl 4 :11-9.
10.	Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988;49:112-7.
11.	Terquem A, Dadoune JP. Aniline blue staining of human spermatozoa chromatin: Evaluation of nuclear maturation. In: Andre J. editor. The Sperm Cell. London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1983. p. 696-701.
12.	Bianchi PG, Manicardi GC, Urner F, Campana A, Sakkas D. Chromatin packaging and morphology in ejaculated human spermatozoa: Evidence of hidden anomalies in normal spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 1996;2:139-44.
13.	Bos-Mikich A, Mattos AL, Ferrari AN. Early cleavage of human embryos: An effective method for predicting successful IVF/ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2658-61.
14.	Esterhuizen AD, Franken DR, Lourens JG, Van Zyl C, Müller II, Van Rooyen LH. Chromatin packaging as an indicator of human sperm dysfunction. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000;17:508-14.
15.	Ward WS, Coffey DS. DNA packaging and organization in mammalian spermatozoa: Comparison with somatic cells. Biol Reprod 1991;44:569-74.
16.	Balhorn R. Mammalian protamine: Structures and molecular interactions. In: Adolph KW, editor. Molecular Biology of Chromosome Function. New York: Springer; 1989. p. 366-95.
17.	Godowicz B. Histochemical and autoradiographic studies of abnormal spermatozoa in mice of the inbred KE strain. Folia Histochem Cytochem (Krakow) 1977;15:211-5.
18.	Windt ML, De Beer PM, Franken DR, Rhemrev J, Menkveld R, Lombard CJ, et al. Sperm decondensation and semen parameters: Utilization of a simple staining technique for the evaluation of human sperm decondensation. Andrologia 1994;26:67-72.
19.	Filatov MV, Semenova EV, Vorob'eva OA, Leont'eva OA, Dorbchenko EA. Relationship between abnormal sperm chromatin packing and IVF results. Mol Hum Reprod 1999;5:825-30.
20.	Hoshi K, Katayose H, Yanagida K, Kimura Y, Sato A. The relationship between acridine orange fluorescence of sperm nuclei and the fertilizing ability of human sperm. Fertil Steril 1996;66:634-9.
21.	Tavalaee M, Razavi S, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Influence of sperm chromatin anomalies on assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1119-26.
22.	Nasr-Esfahani MH, Razavi S., Tavalaee M. Failed fertilization after ICSI and spermiogenic defects. Fertil Steril 2008;89:892-8.
23.	Razavi S, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Mardani M, Mafi A, Moghdam A. Effect of human sperm chromatin anomalies on fertilization outcome post-ICSI. Andrologia 2003;35:238-43.
24.	Lolis D, Gergiou I, Syrrou M, Zikopoulos K, Konstantelli M, Messinis I. Chromomycin A3-staining as an indicator of protamine deficiency and fertilization. Int J Androl 1996;19:23-7.
25.	Iranpour FG, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Valojerdi MR, al-Taraihi TM. Chromomycin A3 staining as a useful tool for evaluation of male fertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000;17:60-6.
26.	Lin MH, Kuo-Kuang Lee R, Li SH, Lu CH, Sun FJ, Hwu YM. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates. Fertil Steril 2008;90:352-9.
27.	Sadeghi MR, Lakpour N, Heidari-Vala H, Hodjat M, Amirjannati N, Hossaini Jadda H, et al. Relationship between sperm chromatin status and ICSI outcome in men with obstructive azoospermia and unexplained infertile normozoospermia. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2011;52:645-51.
28.	Nili HA, Mozdarani H, Aleyasin A. Correlation of sperm DNA damage with protamine deficiency in Iranian subfertile men. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;18:479-85.
29.	Kazerooni T, Asadi N, Jadid L, Kazerooni M, Ghanadi A, Ghaffarpasand F, et al. Evaluation of sperm's chromatin quality with acridine orange test, chromomycin A3 and aniline blue staining in couples with unexplained recurrent abortion. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009;26:591-6.
30.	Manicardi GC, Bianchi PG, Pantano S, Azzoni P, Bizzaro D, Bianchi U, et al. Presence of endogenous nicks in DNA of ejaculated human spermatozoa and its relationship to chromomycin A3 accessibility. Biol Reprod 1995;52:864-7.

Advanced Biomedical Research