Fecal calprotectin is a useful marker to diagnose ulcerative colitis from irritable bowel syndrome

Authors

1 Department of Gastroenterology, Isfahan Liver Disease Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Department of Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: This study was aimed to evaluate the predictive value of fecal calprotectin in patients with ulcerative colitis from patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).
Materials and Methods: Between May and October 2013, 88 adult patients, between the age 18 and 65 years with a history of chronic diarrhea of unknown origin were assessed. Standard colonoscopies were performed in all patients to assess ulcerative colitis. Before colonoscopies, they were asked to supply a stool specimen. Fecal calprotectin value was measured using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit.
Results: The mean of age, gender combination, and body mass index were not significantly different between patients with ulcerative colitis or IBS. The duration of disease in ulcerative colitis patients was significantly higher than IBS patients (P < 0.0001). The level of calprotectin in ulcerative colitis patients was significantly higher than IBS patients (265.9 vs 115.8, respectively, P = 0.001). Also, cutoff value >164 μg/g with sensitivity and specify of 57 (CI: 41%-71.6%), and 75 (CI: 59.7%-56.8%), respectively, was the best for discrimination between patients with ulcerative colitis and those with IBS.
Conclusion: Our results show that fecal calprotectin as a noninvasive method, which can be used to identify patients with ulcerative colitis from IBS patients has low sensitivity and specificity.

Keywords

1.
Limburg PJ, Ahlquist DA, Sandborn WJ, Mahoney DW, Devens ME, Harrington JJ, et al. Fecal calprotectin levels predict colorectal inflammation among patients with chronic diarrhea referred for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:2831-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Donowitz M, Kokke FT, Saidi R. Evaluation of patients with chronic diarrhea. N Engl J Med 1995;332:725-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Delvaux M. Functional bowel disorders and irritable bowel syndrome in Europe. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;18(Suppl 3):75-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Irvine EJ. Review article: Patients' fears and unmet needs in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20(Suppl 4):54-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Laharie D, Mesli S, El Hajbi F, Chabrun E, Chanteloup E, Capdepont M, et al. Prediction of Crohn's disease relapse with faecal calprotectin in infliximab responders: A prospective study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;34:462-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Hoff G, Grotmol T, Thiis-Evensen E, Bretthauer M, Gondal G, Vatn MH. Testing for faecal calprotectin (PhiCal) in the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: Comparison with an immunochemical test for occult blood (FlexSure OBT). Gut 2004;53:1329-33.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Schröder O, Naumann M, Shastri Y, Povse N, Stein J. Prospective evaluation of faecal neutrophil-derived proteins in identifying intestinal inflammation: Combination of parameters does not improve diagnostic accuracy of calprotectin. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26:1035-42.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Fine KD, Schiller LR. AGA technical review on the evaluation and management of chronic diarrhea. Gastroenterology 1999;116:1464-86.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Berni Canani R, Rapacciuolo L, Romano MT, Tanturri de Horatio L, Terrin G, Manguso F, et al. Diagnostic value of faecal calprotectin in paediatric gastroenterology clinical practice. Dig Liver Dis 2004;36:467-70.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Gisbert JP, McNicholl AG. Questions and answers on the role of faecal calprotectin as a biological marker in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Liver Dis 2008;41:56-66.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
El-Badry A, Sedrak H, Rashed L. Faecal calprotectin in differentiating between functional and organic bowel diseases. Arab J Gastroenterol 2010;11:70-3.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Mayer EA. Clinical practice. Irritable bowel syndrome. New Engl J Med 2008;358:1692-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Costa F, Mumolo MG, Bellini M, Romano MR, Ceccarelli L, Arpe P, et al. Role of faecal calprotectin as non-invasive marker of intestinal inflammation. Dig Liver Dis 2003;35:642-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Chung-Faye G, Hayee B, Maestranzi S, Donaldson N, Forgacs I, Sherwood R. Fecal M2-pyruvate kinase (M2-PK): A novel marker of intestinal inflammation. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007;13:1374-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Costa F, Mumolo MG, Ceccarelli L, Bellini M, Romano MR, Sterpi C, et al. Calprotectin is a stronger predictive marker of relapse in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn's disease. Gut 2005;54:364-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Langhorst J, Elsenbruch S, Mueller T, Rueffer A, Spahn G, Michalsen A, et al. Comparison of 4 neutrophil-derived proteins in feces as indicators of disease activity in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2005;11:1085-91.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Summerton CB, Longlands MG, Wiener K, Shreeve DR. Faecal calprotectin: A marker of inflammation throughout the intestinal tract. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;14:841-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
von Roon AC, Karamountzos L, Purkayastha S, Reese GE, Darzi AW, Teare JP, et al. Diagnostic precision of fecal calprotectin for inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal malignancy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:803-13.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
van Rheenen PF, Van de Vijver E, Fidler V. Faecal calprotectin for screening of patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease: Diagnostic meta-analysis. BMJ 2010;341:c3369.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Kaiser T, Langhorst J, Wittkowski H, Becker K, Friedrich AW, Rueffer A, et al. Faecal S100A12 as a non-invasive marker distinguishing inflammatory bowel disease from irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 2007;56:1706-13.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
D'Incà R, Dal Pont E, Di Leo V, Ferronato A, Fries W, Vettorato MG, et al. Calprotectin and lactoferrin in the assessment of intestinal inflammation and organic disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:429-37.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Schoepfer AM, Trummler M, Seeholzer P, Criblez DH, Seibold F. Accuracy of four fecal assays in the diagnosis of colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1697-706.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Langhorst J, Elsenbruch S, Koelzer J, Rueffer A, Michalsen A, Dobos GJ. Noninvasive markers in the assessment of intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases: Performance of fecal lactoferrin, calprotectin, and PMN-elastase, CRP, and clinical indices. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:162-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Schoepfer AM, Trummler M, Seeholzer P, Seibold-Schmid B, Seibold F. Discriminating IBD from IBS: Comparison of the test performance of fecal markers, blood leukocytes, CRP, and IBD antibodies. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008;14:32-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Carroccio A, Iacono G, Cottone M, Di Prima L, Cartabellotta F, Cavataio F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin assay in distinguishing organic causes of chronic diarrhea from irritable bowel syndrome: A prospective study in adults and children. Clin Chem 2003;49:861-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Silberer H, Küppers B, Mickisch O, Baniewicz W, Drescher M, Traber L, et al. Fecal leukocyte proteins in inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Lab 2005;51:117-26.  Back to cited text no. 26