Effect of age on the phenotype of metabolic syndrome in developing country

Authors

1 Department of Metabolic Syndrome, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Cardiology, Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Department of Biostatistics, Skin Disease and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 Hypertension Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

5 Nutrition Research, Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

6 Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine how age groups effect on the phenotype of metabolic syndrome (MetS) among Iranian population.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted as part of Isfahan Healthy Heart Program. Height, weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure were measured by trained health-care professionals. MetS was defined as having three or more of the National Cholesterol Education Program III criteria. The relation between different age groups and different phenotypes of MetS was examined using the multinomial logistic regression.
Results: We found low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c) was the most common feature, followed by hypertriglyceridemia (HTG), abdominal obesity (ABO), hypertension (HTN), and high fasting blood glucose in decreasing order of prevalence. The most prevalent combination of MetS components was hypertrigeceridemia, low HDL-c and ABO (50.7%) in all subjects and especially in younger age group (63.2%). In elder age group, the most prevalent three components combination was HTG, Low HDL-c and HTN (43.9%). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that elder subjects were at approximately 12 times higher risk of having the combination HTG, ABO, low HDL-c, and HTN (P < 0.001) compared to the middle age subjects who had a lower risk for the same combination; (2 [1.49-3.49]) (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study provides a nationally representative estimate of the prevalence of different phenotypes of MetS across different age groups. Regarding different phenotypes of MetS in various age groups need to have important implications in the clinical management of these patients and the implementation of public health.

Keywords

1.
Qiao Q, DECODE Study Group. Comparison of different definitions of the metabolic syndrome in relation to cardiovascular mortality in European men and women. Diabetologia 2006;49:2837-46.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Thomas GN, Schooling CM, McGhee SM, Ho SY, Cheung BM, Wat NM, et al. Metabolic syndrome increases all-cause and vascular mortality: The Hong Kong cardiovascular risk factor study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007;66:666-71.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wassink AM, van der Graaf Y, Olijhoek JK, Visseren FL, SMART Study Group. Metabolic syndrome and the risk of new vascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease or abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur Heart J 2008;29:213-23.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Sarrafzadegan N, Kelishadi R, Baghaei A, Hussein Sadri G, Malekafzali H, Mohammadifard N, et al. . Metabolic syndrome: An emerging public health problem in Iranian women: Isfahan healthy heart program. Int J Cardiol 2008;131:90-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Gharipour M, Kelishadi R, Toghianifar N, Tavassoli AA, Khosravi AR, Sajadi F, et al. Socioeconomic disparities and smoking habits in metabolic syndrome: Evidence from Isfahan healthy heart program. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2011;13:537-43.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Gharipour M, Kelishadi R, Baghaie M, Rabiei K. Metabolic syndrome in an Iranian adult population. Eur Heart J 2006;27 Suppl 1:250-251.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Haas GM, Bertsch T, Schwandt P. Trends of components of the metabolic syndrome in German first graders throughout 10 years: The PEP family heart study. Cholesterol 2012;2012:231962.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Dajani R, Khader YS, Hakooz N, Fatahalla R, Quadan F. Metabolic syndrome between two ethnic minority groups (Circassians and Chechens) and the original inhabitants of Jordan. Endocrine 2013;43:112-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Stefanov TS, Temelkova-Kurktschiev TS. The metabolic syndrome in Bulgaria. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2011;53:5-14.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Xu H, Song Y, You NC, Zhang ZF, Greenland S, Ford ES, et al. Prevalence and clustering of metabolic risk factors for type 2 diabetes among Chinese adults in Shanghai, China. BMC Public Health 2010;10:683.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ford ES, Li C, Zhao G. Prevalence and correlates of metabolic syndrome based on a harmonious definition among adults in the US. J Diabetes 2010;2:180-93.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Hosseini-Esfahani F, Mousavi Nasl Khameneh A, Mirmiran P, Ghanbarian A, Azizi F. Trends in risk factors for cardiovascular disease among Iranian adolescents: The Tehran lipid and glucose study, 1999-2008. J Epidemiol 2011;21:319-28.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kelishadi R, Gharipour M, Sadri GH, Tavasoli AA, Amani A. Cardiovascular disease risk factors, metabolic syndrome and obesity in an Iranian population. East Mediterr Health J 2008;14:1070-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Sarraf-Zadegan N, Sadri G, Malek Afzali H, Baghaei M, Mohammadi Fard N, Shahrokhi S, et al. Isfahan healthy heart programme: A comprehensive integrated community-based programme for cardiovascular disease prevention and control. Design, methods and initial experience. Acta Cardiol 2003;58:309-20.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Sarraf-Zadegan N, Baghaei M, Sadri G, Kelishadi R, Malek AH, Boshtam M, et al. Isfahan healthy heart program: Evaluation of comprehensive, community-based interventions for non-communicable disease prevention. Prev Contr 2006;2:73-84.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third report of the National cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002;106:3143-421.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ford ES, Giles WH, Mokdad AH. Increasing prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US Adults. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2444-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Gharipour M, Sarrafzadegan N, Sadeghi M, Andalib E, Talaie M, Shafie D, Aghababaie E. Predictors of Metabolic Syndrome in the Iranian Population: Waist Circumference, Body Mass Index, or Waist to Hip Ratio? Cholesterol 2013; 2013:198384.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Sarrafzadegan N, Gharipour M, Sadeghi M, Khosravi AR, Tavassoli AA. Metabolic syndrome in Iranian elderly. ARYA Atheroscler 2012;7:157-61.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Tavassoli AA, Gharipour M, Khosravi A, Kelishadi R, Siadat ZD, Bahonar A, et al. Gender differences in obesogenic behaviour, socioeconomic and metabolic factors in a population-based sample of Iranians: The IHHP study. J Health Popul Nutr 2010;28:602-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Sniderman AD, Holme I, Aastveit A, Furberg C, Walldius G, Jungner I. Relation of age, the apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-I ratio, and the risk of fatal myocardial infarction and implications for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:217-21.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Kraja AT, Borecki IB, North K, Tang W, Myers RH, Hopkins PN, et al. Longitudinal and age trends of metabolic syndrome and its risk factors: The family heart study. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2006;3:41.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Razzouk L, Muntner P. Ethnic, gender, and age-related differences in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Curr Hypertens Rep 2009;11:127-32.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Sumner AD, Sardi GL, Reed JF 3 rd . Components of the metabolic syndrome differ between young and old adults in the US population. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2012;14:502-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Seo JA, Kim BG, Cho H, Kim HS, Park J, Baik SH, et al. The cutoff values of visceral fat area and waist circumference for identifying subjects at risk for metabolic syndrome in elderly Korean: Ansan Geriatric (AGE) cohort study. BMC Public Health 2009;9:443.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Moon HK, Kim EG. Comparing validity of body mass index, waist to hip ratio, and waist circumference to cardiovascular disease risk factors in Korean elderly. Korean J Nutr 2005;38:445-54.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Perissinotto E, Pisent C, Sergi G, Grigoletto F, ILSA Working Group (Italian Longitudinal Study on Ageing). Anthropometric measurements in the elderly: Age and gender differences. Br J Nutr 2002;87:177-86.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Liese AD, Mayer-Davis EJ, Haffner SM. Development of the multiple metabolic syndrome: An epidemiologic perspective. Epidemiol Rev 1998;20:157-72.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
39. Edwards KL, Newman B, Mayer E, Selby JV, Krauss RM, Austin MA. Heritability of factors of the insulin resistance syndrome in women twins. Genet Epidemiol 1997;14:241-53.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Ramos R, Marrugat J, Basagaña X, Sala J, Masiá R, Elosua R, et al. The role of age in cardiovascular risk factor clustering in non-diabetic population free of coronary heart disease. Eur J Epidemiol 2004;19:299-304.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Poulter NR. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease: 'Clustering' in the older hypertensive man. Br J Clin Pract Suppl 1994;74:4-7.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Pasini GF, Donato F, Buizza MA, Fantoni C, Gelatti U, Tani M, et al. Prevalence of risk factors for coronary heart disease in a mountain community in northern Italy. G Ital Cardiol 1999;29:891-7.  Back to cited text no. 32