Analysis of the reporting requirements of clinical case reports dedicated Journals: Towards updating the CARE guideline

Authors
Abolfazl Taheri 1
Peyman Adibi 2
Alireza Abbasi 3
Mojtaba Sabbagh Jaffari 4
Alireza Rahimi 5
1 Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales, Canberra, Australia
4 School of Computer Engineering, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Kerman, Iran
5 Clinical Informationist Research Group, Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Background: Following personalized medicine and the development of e-publishing, a large number of case report–dedicated journals have emerged. But the lack of integrated guidelines is a major obstacle to the quality of this evidence. The purpose of this study is to analyze the reporting requirements of case report–dedicated journals to update and strengthen the CARE guidelines.
Material and Methods: Quantitative and qualitative research approach has been done using the content analysis method. All case report–dedicated journals were selected from Scopus (54 out of a total of 68 journals). By referring to these journals' websites, all the contents of the authors' guideline section and two sample articles were examined as a unit of analysis. Quantitative data includes frequency and percentile; qualitative data was conducted through open coding, creating categories, and abstraction.
Results: 51% of journals are related to Elsevier and Hindawi publications. 14.8% of journals have been launched in the form of companions. 52% of journals endorse the CARE guidelines. Among the CARE elements, title, consent form (100%), discussion, abstract (94.4%), and introduction (90.7%) had the most frequent elements, and timeline and patients' perspective had the least repetition in the authors' guideline. Also, 19 new reporting elements and 27 types of case reports were identified.
Conclusions: Improving the reporting and content quality of case reports is very important to benefit from knowledge synthesis services. Medical journals publishing case reports should follow a more integrated process. An updated version of reporting guidelines needs to be available for publishers and editors of journals.

Keywords

1.
Kidd M, Hibbard C. Introducing journal of medical case reports. J Med Case Rep 2007;1:1.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Akers KG. New journals for publishing medical case reports. J Med Libr Assoc 2016;104:146-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Jenicek M. Clinical case reports, case series, and clinical vignettes: Where are we today. Japanese J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bradley PJ. Guidelines to authors publishing a case report: The need for quality improvement. AME Case Rep 2018;2:10.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Danish S, Reza Z, Sohail A. Case reports and their importance in medical literature. J Pak Med Assoc 2017;67:451-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D, et al. The CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Glob Adv Health Med 2013;2:38-43.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ravi R, Mulkalwar A, Thatte UM, Gogtay NJ. Medical case reports published in PubMed-indexed Indian journals in 2015: Adherence to 2013 CARE guidelines. Indian J Med Ethics 2018;3:192-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Miguel D, Gonzalez N, Illing T, Elsner P. Reporting quality of case reports in international dermatology journals. Br J Dermatol 2018;178:e3-4.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Seguel-Moraga P, Onetto JE, E Uribe S. Reporting quality of case reports about dental trauma published in international journals 2008-2018 assessed by CARE guidelines. Dent Traumatol 2021;37:345-53.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Dragnev NC, Wong SL. Do we CARE about the quality of case reports? A systematic assessment. J Surg Res 2018;231:428-33.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kansteiner K, König S. The role(s) of qualitative content analysis in mixed methods research designs. Forum Qual Soc Res 2020;21.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277-88.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kuckartz U. Qualitative text analysis: A systematic approach. In Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 181-97.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hua F, Walsh T, Glenny AM, Worthington H. Surveys on reporting guideline usage in dental journals. J Dent Res 2016;95:1207-13.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Preparing a manuscript for submission to a medical journal. Retrieved May 2021. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/manuscript-preparation/preparing-for-submission.html#two.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Agha RA, Barai I, Rajmohan S, Lee S, Anwar MO, Fowler AJ, et al. Support for reporting guidelines in surgical journals needs improvement: A systematic review. Int J Surg 2017;45:14-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Miguel D, Elsner P. Author guidelines in dermatological journals discourage the use of the CA se RE port guidelines. Br J Dermatol 2015;173:1107-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Scaffidi MA, Gimpaya N, Li J, Bansal R, Verma Y, Elsolh K, et al. Completeness of reporting for COVID-19 case reports, January to April 2020: A meta-epidemiologic study. CMAJ Open 2021;9:295-301.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Sorinola O, Olufowobi O, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. Instructions to authors for case reporting are limited: A review of a core journal list. BMC Med Educ 2004;4:4.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Moher D, Pereira-Cenci T. Research reporting guidelines in dentistry: A survey of editors. Braz Dental J 2017;28:3-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Van Haselen RA. Homeopathic clinical case reports: Development of a supplement (HOM-CASE) to the CARE clinical case reporting guideline. Complement Ther Med 2016;25:78-85.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Munk N, Boulanger K. Adaptation of the CARE guidelines for therapeutic massage and bodywork publications: Efforts to improve the impact of case reports. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork 2014;7:32-40.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Fu S, Cheng CW, Zhang L, Zhong LLD, Kun W, Lin J, et al. Consensus-based recommendations for case reports in Chinese medicine (CARC). Chin J Integr Med 2016;22:73-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
Advanced Biomedical Research
Volume 2023, February
February 2023
Pages 1-12