Analysis of the reporting requirements of clinical case reports dedicated Journals: Towards updating the CARE guideline

Taheri, Abolfazl; Adibi, Peyman; Abbasi, Alireza; Jaffari, Mojtaba Sabbagh; Rahimi, Alireza

Analysis of the reporting requirements of clinical case reports dedicated Journals: Towards updating the CARE guideline

Authors

¹ Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

² Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

³ School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales, Canberra, Australia

⁴ School of Computer Engineering, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Kerman, Iran

⁵ Clinical Informationist Research Group, Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Following personalized medicine and the development of e-publishing, a large number of case report–dedicated journals have emerged. But the lack of integrated guidelines is a major obstacle to the quality of this evidence. The purpose of this study is to analyze the reporting requirements of case report–dedicated journals to update and strengthen the CARE guidelines.
Material and Methods: Quantitative and qualitative research approach has been done using the content analysis method. All case report–dedicated journals were selected from Scopus (54 out of a total of 68 journals). By referring to these journals' websites, all the contents of the authors' guideline section and two sample articles were examined as a unit of analysis. Quantitative data includes frequency and percentile; qualitative data was conducted through open coding, creating categories, and abstraction.
Results: 51% of journals are related to Elsevier and Hindawi publications. 14.8% of journals have been launched in the form of companions. 52% of journals endorse the CARE guidelines. Among the CARE elements, title, consent form (100%), discussion, abstract (94.4%), and introduction (90.7%) had the most frequent elements, and timeline and patients' perspective had the least repetition in the authors' guideline. Also, 19 new reporting elements and 27 types of case reports were identified.
Conclusions: Improving the reporting and content quality of case reports is very important to benefit from knowledge synthesis services. Medical journals publishing case reports should follow a more integrated process. An updated version of reporting guidelines needs to be available for publishers and editors of journals.

Keywords

References

1.	Kidd M, Hibbard C. Introducing journal of medical case reports. J Med Case Rep 2007;1:1.
2.	Akers KG. New journals for publishing medical case reports. J Med Libr Assoc 2016;104:146-9.
3.	Jenicek M. Clinical case reports, case series, and clinical vignettes: Where are we today. Japanese J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:1-5.
4.	Bradley PJ. Guidelines to authors publishing a case report: The need for quality improvement. AME Case Rep 2018;2:10.
5.	Danish S, Reza Z, Sohail A. Case reports and their importance in medical literature. J Pak Med Assoc 2017;67:451-3.
6.	Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D, et al. The CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Glob Adv Health Med 2013;2:38-43.
7.	Ravi R, Mulkalwar A, Thatte UM, Gogtay NJ. Medical case reports published in PubMed-indexed Indian journals in 2015: Adherence to 2013 CARE guidelines. Indian J Med Ethics 2018;3:192-5.
8.	Miguel D, Gonzalez N, Illing T, Elsner P. Reporting quality of case reports in international dermatology journals. Br J Dermatol 2018;178:e3-4.
9.	Seguel-Moraga P, Onetto JE, E Uribe S. Reporting quality of case reports about dental trauma published in international journals 2008-2018 assessed by CARE guidelines. Dent Traumatol 2021;37:345-53.
10.	Dragnev NC, Wong SL. Do we CARE about the quality of case reports? A systematic assessment. J Surg Res 2018;231:428-33.
11.	Kansteiner K, König S. The role(s) of qualitative content analysis in mixed methods research designs. Forum Qual Soc Res 2020;21.
12.	Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277-88.
13.	Kuckartz U. Qualitative text analysis: A systematic approach. In Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 181-97.
14.	Hua F, Walsh T, Glenny AM, Worthington H. Surveys on reporting guideline usage in dental journals. J Dent Res 2016;95:1207-13.
15.	International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Preparing a manuscript for submission to a medical journal. Retrieved May 2021. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/manuscript-preparation/preparing-for-submission.html#two.
16.	Agha RA, Barai I, Rajmohan S, Lee S, Anwar MO, Fowler AJ, et al. Support for reporting guidelines in surgical journals needs improvement: A systematic review. Int J Surg 2017;45:14-7.
17.	Miguel D, Elsner P. Author guidelines in dermatological journals discourage the use of the CA se RE port guidelines. Br J Dermatol 2015;173:1107-8.
18.	Scaffidi MA, Gimpaya N, Li J, Bansal R, Verma Y, Elsolh K, et al. Completeness of reporting for COVID-19 case reports, January to April 2020: A meta-epidemiologic study. CMAJ Open 2021;9:295-301.
19.	Sorinola O, Olufowobi O, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. Instructions to authors for case reporting are limited: A review of a core journal list. BMC Med Educ 2004;4:4.
20.	Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Moher D, Pereira-Cenci T. Research reporting guidelines in dentistry: A survey of editors. Braz Dental J 2017;28:3-8.
21.	Van Haselen RA. Homeopathic clinical case reports: Development of a supplement (HOM-CASE) to the CARE clinical case reporting guideline. Complement Ther Med 2016;25:78-85.
22.	Munk N, Boulanger K. Adaptation of the CARE guidelines for therapeutic massage and bodywork publications: Efforts to improve the impact of case reports. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork 2014;7:32-40.
23.	Fu S, Cheng CW, Zhang L, Zhong LLD, Kun W, Lin J, et al. Consensus-based recommendations for case reports in Chinese medicine (CARC). Chin J Integr Med 2016;22:73-9.

Advanced Biomedical Research