Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality rate in caesarean section and vaginal delivery


Department of Gynecology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran


Background: The cesarean section is one of the most common procedures to prevent health-threatening risks to the mother and infant. Increasing rate of cesarean section attracted the attention of professionals and the overall objective of this study was to determine the frequency of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates in the two methods of delivery.
Materials and Methods: In a comparative cohort study, 300 cases undergoing caesarean section and 300 cases with vaginal delivery were selected in two main hospitals of Isfahan, Iran during 2013 and 2014. Demographic characteristics and factors related to mortality and morbidity of mothers and infants were studied. Mothers were also recruited 6 weeks after delivery to ask for complications. Mothers and infants mortality and morbidity were studied and analyzed by SPSS 22 software.
Results: Follow-up of deliveries up to 1-month after delivery suggested 2 cases of infant death (7%) in vaginal delivery group, while no case of infant death was reported in cesarean delivery group (P = 0.5). Incidence of fever was observed in first 10 days after delivery in 7 cases in the vaginal delivery group and 11 cases in the cesarean delivery group (2.3% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.4).
Conclusion: Despite all the benefits of vaginal delivery compared with cesarean section, in many cases, especially in emergency cesarean section delivery can substantially reduce the maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. It is recommended to assess the complications of each method in all pregnant women about to give birth, and then decide on the method of delivery.


Cunning HA, Count L, Steven B. Williams Obstetrics. 24th ed., Ch. 25. MC Graw Hill Publication; 2014. p. 544-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
Guyot A, Carbonnel M, Frey C, Pharisien I, Uzan M, Carbillon L. Uterine rupture: Risk factors, maternal and perinatal complications. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2010;39:238-45.  Back to cited text no. 2
Kwee A, Cohlen BJ, Kanhai HH, Bruinse HW, Visser GH. Caesarean section on request: A survey in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;113:186-90.  Back to cited text no. 3
Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS, et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ 2007;176:455-60.  Back to cited text no. 4
Allen VM, O'Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:286-94.  Back to cited text no. 5
Declercq E, Barger M, Cabral HJ, Evans SR, Kotelchuck M, Simon C, et al. Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:669-77.  Back to cited text no. 6
Ministry of Health and Medical Education Report, Department of Medication and Treatment, Investigation of Cesarean Delivery and Promotion of Vaginal Delivery in the Country, 2014.  Back to cited text no. 7
James DK, Steer PJ. High Risk Pregnancy. 4th ed. St. Louis, Mo 63403: Saunders Elsevier Publication; 2011. p. 315-20.  Back to cited text no. 8
Cunningham G, Leveno KJ. Williams Obstetrics. 24th ed., Vol. II. New York: MC Graw Hill Publication; 2012. p. 182-90.  Back to cited text no. 9
Elliot M. Pediatrician attendance at cesarean delivery: Necessary or not? Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:338-40.  Back to cited text no. 10
Haghighi N, Ibrahimi H. Comparing frequency of vaginal and cesarean delivery and its causes in Shahrood City 2000. J Reprod Infertil 2002;3:50-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
Rajasekar D, Hall M. Urinary tract injuries during obstetric intervention. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:731-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: Summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:1181-93.  Back to cited text no. 13
Boskabadi H, Zakerihamidi M, Bagheri F. Outcomes of vaginal delivery and cesarean in Mashhad Ghaem University Hospital. Tehran Univ Med J 2014;71:807-15.  Back to cited text no. 14