Analysis and comparison of the effects of N-BiPAP and Bubble-CPAP in treatment of preterm newborns with the weight of below 1500 grams affiliated with respiratory distress syndrome: A randomised clinical trial

Authors
Alireza Sadeghnia 1
Behzad Barekateyn 1
Zohre Badiei 1
Seyyed Mohsen Hosseini 2
1 Department of Pediatric, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Epidemiology and Bio-statistics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Background: Nowadays, establishment of nCPAP and surfactant administration is considered to be the first level of intervention for newborns engaged in the process of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS). In order to decrease the side effects of the nCPAP management placed in noninvasive-non-cycled respiratory support. Noninvasive-cycled respiratory support mechanism have been developed such as N-BiPAP. Therefore, we compared N-BiPAP with Bubble-CPAP in a clinical trial.
Materials and Methods: This research was done as an on newborns weighing less than 1500 grams affiliated with RDS. A3 The total number of newborns was 70. Newborns were divided into two groups with the sample size of 35 patients in each, according to odd and even document numbers. One group was treated with N-BiPAP and the other with Bubble-CPAP. Patients were compared according to the length of treatment with noninvasive respiratory support, length of oxygen intake, number of surfactant doses administered, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, apnea, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), chronic lung disease, intraventricular hemorrhage, pneumothorax, and death. Data was recorded and compared.
Results: The average duration for noninvasive respiratory support and the average time of need to complementary oxygen was not significantly different in both groups (P value > 0.05). Need for invasive ventilation, also chronic lung disease, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), pneumothorax, need for the next dose of surfactant, and the death rate did also have no meaningful difference. (P value > 0.05).
Conclusion: In this research N-BiPAP did not show any obvious clinical preference over the Bubble-CPAP in treatment of newborns weighing less than 1500 grams and affiliated with RDS.

Keywords

1.
Bhandari V, Finer NN, Ehrenkranz RA, Saha S, Das A, Walsh MC, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and neonatal outcomes. Pediatrics 2009;124:517-26.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mahmoud RA, Roehr CC, Schmalisch G. Current methods of non-invasive ventilator support for neonates. Paediatric Paediatr Respir Rev 2011;12:196-205.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Davis PG, Morley CJ, Owen LS. Non-invasive respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress: Continuous positive airway pressure and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;14:14-20.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Soll RF, Morley CJ. Prophylactic versus selective use of surfsctant in preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;2:CD000510.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Dani C, Bertini G, Pezzati M, Cecchi A, Caviglioli C, Rubaltelli FF. Early extubation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants <30 weeks gestation. Pediaterics 2004;113:e560-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Booth C, Premkumar H, Yannoulis A, Thomson M, Harrison M, Edwards AD. Sustainable use of continuous positive airway pressure in extremely preterm infants during the first week after delivery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006;91:F398-402.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, Carlin JB, et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2008;358:700-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
de Winter JP, de Vries MA, Zimmermann LJ. Clinical practice: Noninvasive respiratory support in newborns. Eur J Pediatr 2010;169:777-82.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: A survey of practice in England. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008;93:F148-50.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Migliori C, Motta M, Angeli A, Chirico G. Nasal bilevel Vs. continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol 2005;40:426-30.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Gina A, Eugenia M, Sara G, Luca P, Mariangela G, Giacomo F. Nlm Unique. Acta Paediatric Norway 2009;39:24-28.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kishore M, Dutta S, Kumar P. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr 2009;98:1412-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana P, Daniele I, Cavigioli F, Rossi S, et al. Nasal CPAP Vs Bi-level Nasal CPAP in preterms with RDS: A randomized control study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;99:F85-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Stevens TP, Blennow M, Myers EH, Soll R. Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; CD003063.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Mazella M, Bellini C, Calevo MG, Campone F, Massocco D, Mezzano P, et al. A randomized control study comparing the Infant Flow Driver with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;85:F86-90.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Rojas MA, Lozano JM, Rojas MX, Laughon M, Bose CL, Rondon MA, et al. Very early surfactant without mandatory ventilation in premature infants treated with early continuous positive airway pressure: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 2009;123:137-42.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ali N, Claure N, Alegria X, Ugard CD, Organero R, Bancalari E. Efeect of non-invasive pressure support ventilation (NI-PSV) on ventilation and respiratory effort in very low birth weight infant. Pediatr Pulmonol 2007;42:704-10.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Aghai ZH, Sasloe JG, Nakhla T, Milcarek B, Hart J, Lawrysh-plunkett R, et al. Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) decreases work of breathing (WOB) in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). Pediatr Pulmonol 2006;41:875-81.  Back to cited text no. 18
Advanced Biomedical Research
Volume 2016, January
January 2016
Pages 1-5