Qualitative indices and enhancement rate of CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: Comparison between test bolus and bolus-tracking methods

Moradi, Maryam; Khalili, Babak

Qualitative indices and enhancement rate of CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: Comparison between test bolus and bolus-tracking methods

Authors

Department of Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to assess the qualitative indices and enhancement rate of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism using Test bolus and Bolus-tracking techniques.
Materials and Methods: Fifty-two patients with suspected pulmonary embolism that passed informed consent were randomly divided in the two groups. In each group, demographic characteristics, qualitative indices, and enhancement rate of CTPA were recorded.

Results: The diagnostic result obtained in majority of the participants in the two groups (88.5 % in Test bolus group vs. 73.1% in the Bolus tracking group). In the case of quantitative variables, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups (P > 0.05). The only statistically significant difference between the two groups is average of "X-ray dose".
Conclusion: The results of our study show that there is no statistically significant difference between the Bolus Tracking and Test Bolus techniques for producing more homogeneous enhancement.

Keywords

References

1.	Ma QB, Yao WZ, Chen JM, Ge HX, Li S, Zheng YA. Pulmonary embolism in adolescents. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012;125:1089-94.
2.	Elias A, Colombier D, Victor G, Elias M, Arnaud C, Juchet H, et al. Diagnostic performance of complete lower limb venous ultrasound in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2004;91:187-95.
3.	Ouellette DW, Patocka C. Pulmonary Embolism. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2012;30:329-75.
4.	Rodrigues JC, Mathias H, Negus IS, Manghat NE, Hamilton MC. Intravenous contrast medium administration at 128 multidetector row CT pulmonary angiography: Bolus tracking versus test bolus and the implications for diagnostic quality and effective dose. Clin Radiol 2012;67:1053-60.
5.	Tapson VF. Acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1037-52.
6.	Dalen JE, Alpert JS. Natural history of pulmonary embolism. Prog Cardiovascular Dis 1975;17:259-70.
7.	Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S, Agnelli G, Galie N, Pruszczyk P, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2008;29:2276-315.
8.	Loud PA, Katz DS, Bruce DA, Klippenstein DL, Grossman ZD. Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography. Radiology 2001;219:498-502.
9.	Hartmann IJ, Wittenberg R, Schaefer-Prokop C. Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism using multi-detector CT angiography: An update on imaging technique and interpretation. Eur J Radiol 2010;74:40-9.
10.	Mayo J, Thakur Y. Pulmonary CT angiography as first-line imaging for PE: Image quality and radiation dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:522-8.
11.	Cronin P, Weg JG, Kazerooni EA. The role of multidetector computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Semin Nucl Med 2008;38:418-31.
12.	Schoepf UJ, Costello P. CT angiography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: State of the art. Radiology 2004;230:329-37.
13.	Henes FO, Groth M, Begemann PG, Adam G, Regier M. Intraindividual comparison of gadolinium- and iodine-enhanced 64-slice multidetector CT pulmonary angiography for the detection of pulmonary embolism in a porcine model. Emerg Radiol 2011;18:189-95.
14.	George RT, Ichihara T, Lima JA, Lardo AC. A method for reconstructing the arterial input function during helical CT: Implications for myocardial perfusion distribution imaging. Radiology 2010;255:396-404.
15.	Henzler T, Meyer M, Reichert M, Krissak R, Nance JW Jr., Haneder S, et al. Dual-energy CT angiography of the lungs: Comparison of test bolus and bolus tracking techniques for the determination of scan delay. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:132-8.
16.	Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Log A, Raaijmakers RH, Mollet N, Pattynama PM, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: Test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology 2004;233:817-23.
17.	Kerl JM, Lehnert T, Schell B, Bodelle B, Beeres M, Jacobi V, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at high-pitch dual-source CT pulmonary angiography: Test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:2887-91.
18.	Saghaei M. Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004;4:26.

Advanced Biomedical Research