The Comparative Study of Refractive Index Variations between Haigis, Srk/T and Hoffer-Q Formulas Used for Preoperative Biometry Calculation in Patients with the Axial Length >25 mm

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Hasan Razmjoo
Hosein Atarzadeh
Neda Kargar
Mohammad Behfarnia
Kobra Nasrollahi
Ali Kamali
Department of Ophthalmology, Isfahan University of Medical sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Background: To compare refractive index variation between Hoffer-Q, Haigis and SRK/T formulas used for preoperative biometry calculation in patients with axial length >25 mm, undergoing cataract surgery. Materials and Methods: This is a randomized clinical trial study was performed on 54 eyes of 54 patients with ages of 40–70 years old and axial length >25 mm classified into three groups that their IOL POWER were calculated by Haigis, SRK/T and Hoffer-Q formulas before undergoing cataract surgery. Their refractive index variations were calculated from the difference between predicted refractive error formula and actual post-operative refractive error formula. The collected data was entered in SPSS software and was analyzed by ANOVA and Chi-square statistical test. Results: With comparison sphere, astigmatism and spherical equivalent indexes before and after of cataract surgery between Haigis, SRK/T, and Hoffer-Q formulas, statistically significant differences were found between the mean of sphere and SE indexes in patients with use of Haigis and SRK/T formulas that have been more favorable post-operative refraction. Conclusions: Haigis formula and then, with slight difference, SRK/T formula have better and more acceptable post-operative refraction results than Hoffer-Q formula in patients with high axial myopia. Therefore, it is recommended using Haigis and SRK/T formulas for IOL power calculation in patients with high axial myopia undergoing cataract surgery.

Keywords

1.
Javadi MA, Rezaei A, Karimian F, Amini H, Pakravan M, Mahdavinouri K, et al. Prevalence of cataract in people above 40 years old resident in Tehran. Bina J Ophthalmol 2004; 9:309-17.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Soudi S, editor. Cataract. Tehran: Hayan-Abasaleh; 2006. 89-91.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Johns KJ, Feder RS, Hamill MB, Miller-Meeks MJ, Rosenfeld SI, Perry PE. Evaluation and management of cataract in adult. In: Liesegang TJ, Deutsch TA, Grand MG, editors. Basic and Clinical Science Course; Section 11: Lens and Cataract. New York: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2004. p. 149-250.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Eleftheriadis H. IOL master biometry: Refractive results of 100 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87:960-3.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
El-Nafees R, Moawad A, Kishk H, Gaafar W. Intra-ocular lens power calculation in patients with high axial myopia before cataract surgery. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2010; 24:77-80.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Terzi E, Wang L, Kohnen T. Accuracy of modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas in refractive lens exchange for high myopia and high hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35:1181-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Koch DD, Wang L. Calculating IOL power in eyes that have had refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29:2039-42.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bang S, Edell E, Yu Q, Pratzer K, Stark W. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations using the IOLMaster in eyes with long axial length and a comparison of various formulas. Ophthalmology 2011; 118:503-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
MacLaren RE, Natkunarajah M, Riaz Y, Bourne RR, Restori M, Allan BD. Biometry and formula accuracy with intraocular lenses used for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143:920-31.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Farag MM, Atwa FA. Haigis and SRK/T formulas for intraocular lens power calculation in high myopia. Menoufiya Med J 2011; 24:155-60.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Reuland AJ, Neens N, Holzer MP, Rabsilber TM, Limberger IJ, Auffarth GU. Calculation of Intraocular Lens Power for High Myopia. 15th SOE Congress and 103rd DOG Congress. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2005. p. 346.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Kapadia P, Dalal N, Patel N, Chauhan MD. Intraocular lens power calculation formulas in high refractive errors… what to choose and when? Natl J Integr Res Med 2013; 4:33-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Petermeier K, Gekeler F, Messias A, Spitzer MS, Haigis W, Szurman P. Intraocular lens power calculation and optimized constants for highly myopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35:1575-81.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Nemeth G, Nagy A, Berta A, Modis L Jr. Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction using immersion ultrasound and optical biometry with and without formula optimization. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012; 250:1321-5.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ghanem AA, El-Sayed HM. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in high myopia. Oman J Ophthalmol 2010;3:126-30.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
16.
Wang JK, Chang SW. Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths. Int J Ophthalmol 2013; 6:150-4.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Wang JK, Hu CY, Chang SW. Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length, J Cataract Refract Surge 2008;34:262-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
Advanced Biomedical Research
Volume 2017, july
July 2017
Pages 1-5