A Comparative Study on the Results of Estimating Children's Weights Based on Arm Circumference, Height, and Body Habitus against Estimated Weight Broselow on 2-24 Months Children in Isfahan

Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad; Nemati, Sirous; Masoumi, Babak; Eshaghiandorche, Azam; Jangjoo, Ali Akbar

A Comparative Study on the Results of Estimating Children's Weights Based on Arm Circumference, Height, and Body Habitus against Estimated Weight Broselow on 2-24 Months Children in Isfahan

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Department of Emergency Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

² Department of Nursing, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Resuscitation of children in different treatment wards is a challenge. Given that the pediatric drug dosing is based on weight and weighing is not practical in emergency situations, it is critical to employ a fast, easy, and reliable technique. Hence, this study attempted to evaluate the real weight children against Broselow estimation. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 1500 children of 2–24 months referred to Isfahan urban and rural health centers in 2015. Children's estimated weights were measured based on the standard Broselow tape and real weights through a digital scale. The factors such as age, sex, height, arm circumference, head circumference, and living place of children were recorded. The collected data were analyzed through independent t-test, ANOVA, and linear regression using SPSS (version 20). Results: The weight difference of children through Broselow estimation was 0.019 kg, and the correlation coefficient was 0.893 (P > 0.05). The difference sorted by age ranges was significant only in >12 months (P < 0.05). It was estimated at error of 10% to be 68.9% correctly. The mean weight estimation error was significant sorted by weight, sex, habitus, and living place of children (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Although Broselow tape has been proved to be accurate it led to a significant error at different age ranges. Hence, the present study estimated the age, arm circumference, and height of Iranian children based on new formulas providing more successful tool through controlling the confounding factors in estimating the real weight.

Keywords

References

1.	Nieman CT, Manacci CF, Super DM, Mancuso C, Fallon WF Jr. Use of the Broselow tape may result in the underresuscitation of children. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:1011-9.
2.	Black K, Barnett P, Wolfe R, Young S. Are methods used to estimate weight in children accurate? Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2002;14:160-5.
3.	Vilke GM, Marino A, Fisher R, Chan TC. Estimation of pediatric patient weight by EMT-PS. J Emerg Med 2001;21:125-8.
4.	Rosenberg M, Greenberger S, Rawal A, Latimer-Pierson J, Thundiyil J. Comparison of Broselow tape measurements versus physician estimations of pediatric weights. Am J Emerg Med 2011;29:482-8.
5.	Abdel-Rahman SM, Paul IM, James LP, Lewandowski A; Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act-Pediatric Trials Network. Evaluation of the Mercy TAPE: Performance against the standard for pediatric weight estimation. Ann Emerg Med 2013;62:332-339.e6.
6.	Krieser D, Nguyen K, Kerr D, Jolley D, Clooney M, Kelly AM. Parental weight estimation of their child's weight is more accurate than other weight estimation methods for determining children's weight in an emergency department? Emerg Med J 2007;24:756-9.
7.	Erker CG, Santamaria M, Moellmann M. Size does matter – Age-related weight estimation in “tall n' thin” and “tiny n' thick” children and a new habitus-adapted alternative to the EPLS-formula. Resuscitation 2014;85:1174-8.
8.	Knight JC, Nazim M, Riggs D, Channel J, Mullet C, Vaughan R, et al. Is the Broselow tape a reliable indicator for use in all pediatric trauma patients?: A look at a rural trauma center. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011;27:479-82.
9.	Graves L, Chayen G, Peat J, O'Leary F. A comparison of actual to estimated weights in Australian children attending a tertiary children's' hospital, using the original and updated APLS, Luscombe and Owens, Best Guess formulae and the Broselow tape. Resuscitation 2014;85:392-6.
10.	Lubitz DS, Seidel JS, Chameides L, Luten RC, Zaritsky AL, Campbell FW. A rapid method for estimating weight and resuscitation drug dosages from length in the pediatric age group. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:576-81.
11.	So TY, Farrington E, Absher RK. Evaluation of the accuracy of different methods used to estimate weights in the pediatric population. Pediatrics 2009;123:e1045-51.
12.	Kun W, Cheng K, Yuen M, Tung W. How good is the Broselow tape measurement for estimation of body weights in paediatric patients for application in Hong Kong. Hong Kong J Paediatr 2000;5:25-30.
13.	Abdel-Rahman SM, Ridge A, Kearns GL. Estimation of body weight in children in the absence of scales: A necessary measurement to insure accurate drug dosing. Arch Dis Child 2014;99:570-4.
14.	Menon S, Kelly AM. How accurate is weight estimation in the emergency department? Emerg Med Australas 2005;17:113-6.
15.	Ramarajan N, Krishnamoorthi R, Strehlow M, Quinn J, Mahadevan SV. Internationalizing the Broselow tape: How reliable is weight estimation in Indian children. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:431-6.
16.	Mackway-Jones K. Advanced Life Support Group (Manchester England). Advanced Paediatric Life Support: The Practical Approach. 4^th ed. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2005.
17.	Phillips BM, Mackway-Jones K, Jewkes F. The European Resuscitation Council's paediatric life support course 'Advanced Paediatric Life Support'. Resuscitation 2000;47:329-34.
18.	Hazell W. Emergency Medicine at Your Fingertips. Publisher: MediMedia (NZ) Limited; 1998, 142 pages.
19.	Leffler S, Hayes M. Analysis of parental estimates of children's weights in the ED. Ann Emerg Med 1997;30:167-70.
20.	Tinning K, Acworth J. Make your Best Guess: An updated method for paediatric weight estimation in emergencies. Emerg Med Australas 2007;19:528-34.
21.	Mahmudzadeh H, editor. Do the length-Based (Broselow) Tape Accurately Estimate Weight of Iranian Children? 20^th International Congress of Pediatrics (Surgery & Emergency Medicine). Iran: Tehran University of Medical Science; 2008.
22.	Akaberian S, Vahedparast H, Ravanipour M, Mirzaei K. Comparison of Broselow tape measurements versus mother estimations of pediatric weights. ISMJ 2013;16:138-43.
23.	DeBoer S, Seaver M, Broselow J. Color coding to reduce errors: The Broselow–Luten system streamlines pediatric emergency treatment. Am J Nurs 2005;105:68-71.
24.	Wells M, Coovadia A, Kramer E, Goldstein L. The PAWPER tape: A new concept tape-based device that increases the accuracy of weight estimation in children through the inclusion of a modifier based on body habitus. Resuscitation 2013;84:227-32.
25.	Hamill PV, Drizd TA, Johnson CL, Reed RB, Roche AF, Moore WM. Physical growth: National Center for Health Statistics percentiles. Am J Clin Nutr 1979;32:607-29.
26.	Bourdeau S, Copeland J, Milne WK. Accuracy of the Broselow tape in estimating the weight ofFirst Nations children. Can J Rural Med 2011;16:121-5.
27.	Casey J, Borland M. Best Guess method: A further external validation study and comparison with other methods. Emerg Med Australas 2010;22:68-74.
28.	Varghese A, Vasudevan VK, Lewin S, Indumathi CK, Dinakar C, Rao SD. Do the length-based (Broselow) Tape, APLS, Argall and Nelson's formulae accurately estimate weight of Indian children? Indian Pediatr 2006;43:889-94.
29.	Theron L, Adams A, Jansen K, Robinson E. Emergency weight estimation in Pacific Island and Maori children who are large-for-age. Emerg Med Australas 2005;17:238-43.
30.	Hofer CK, Ganter M, Tucci M, Klaghofer R, Zollinger A. How reliable is length-based determination of body weight and tracheal tube size in the paediatric age group? The Broselow tape reconsidered. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:283-5.

Advanced Biomedical Research