Authors
1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Anesthesiology, Baghyatollah Medical Sciences University, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Background: Hypotension is one of the most common complications after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Normally, preloading with fluids, especially crystalloids, is used to prevention of hypotension. Methods: In the present randomized clinical trial study, 120 parturients presenting for elective cesarean section with the American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I and II received either 15 cc normal saline or 7 cc/kg hydroxyethyl starch 6% (Voluven) fluid. Information regarding to systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate, incidence of hypotension, adverse effects, the total dose of atropine, and ephedrine were recorded in before and 3, 6, 9, 15, and 20 min after spinal anesthesia. Furthermore, Apgar score of newborn at the 1st and 5th min after birth was recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in mean arterial pressure at different stages such as: Exactly after spinal and 3, 6, 15, and 20 min after spinal anesthesia between two groups (P > 0.05). Total dose of ephedrine and atropine were similar between groups (P > 0.05), respectively. There was no significant difference in Apgar score at the 1st and 5th min after birth between two groups. There were not any adverse effects of drugs in two groups. Conclusions: The results of this study show that hydroxyethyl starch 6% compared to normal saline are similar to prevent hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
Keywords
1. | |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. |
Mitra JK, Roy J, Bhattacharyya P, Yunus M, Lyngdoh NM. Changing trends in the management of hypotension following spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. J Postgrad Med 2013;59:121-6. [Full text] |
6. |
Jenkins MG, Murphy DJ, Little C, McDonald J, McCarron PA. A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of anesthesia obtained by application of a novel topical anesthetic putty with the infiltration of lidocaine for the treatment of lacerations in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2014;63:704-10. |
7. |
Jain R, Sharma R. A comparative study of effects of glycopyrrolate and ondansetron on nausea and vomiting in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Essays Res 2015;9:348-52. [PUBMED] [Full text] |
8. | |
9. | |
10. |
Parida S, Nawaz M, Kundra P. Severe hypotension following spinal anesthesia in patients on amlodipine. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2012;28:408-9. [PUBMED] [Full text] |
11. |
Ranasinghe JS, Birnbach D. Current status of obstetric anaesthesia: Improving satisfaction and safety. Indian J Anaesth 2009;53:608-17. [PUBMED] [Full text] |
12. | |
13. | |
14. | |
15. | |
16. | |
17. | |
18. | |
19. | |
20. |
Jabalameli M, Soltani HA, Hashemi J, Behdad S, Soleimani B. Prevention of post-spinal hypotension using crystalloid, colloid and ephedrine with three different combinations: A double blind randomized study. Adv Biomed Res 2012;1:36. [PUBMED] [Full text] |