Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to determine the predictive value of ultrasonography for results of local steroid injection in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted during a 1-year period in outpatient clinics of rehabilitation and physical medicine including 35 patients with moderate and severe CTS who receive ultrasonography-guided local steroid injection. The Boston self-assessment questionnaire and electrodiagnosis parameters were recorded at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months after therapy. We also recorded the baseline ultrasonography parameters to determine the predictors of outcome. Results: The sensory severity score and functional status scale along with electrodiagnosis parameters decreased significantly at 1 month (P < 0.001) and remained unchanged after 3 months. Volar bulging was negatively associated with sensory nerve action potential latency (r = −0.392; P = 0.020). Cross-sectional area (CSA) of maximal swelling (MS; r = 0.409; P = 0.015), CSA at 2-cm of MS (r = 0.563; P < 0.001), and CSA at 12-cm of MS (r = 0.521; P = 0.001) correlated positively with compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude while maximal swelling/12-cm MS ratio (r = −0.439; P = 0.008) and maximal swelling/2-cm MS ratio (r = −0.342; P = 0.045) correlated negatively. CSA at 12-cm of MS also correlated positively with CMAP amplitude nerve conduction velocity (r = 0.436; P = 0.010). Conclusion: Volar bulging, CSA of maximal swelling, CSA of MS at 2-cm, and CSA of MS at 12-cm are among the ultrasonographic predictors of response to local steroid injection in patients with CTS.
Keywords
1. | |
2. |
Goldberg G, Zeckser JM, Mummaneni R, Tucker JD. Electrosonodiagnosis in carpal tunnel syndrome: A proposed diagnostic algorithm based on an analytic literature review. PM R 2016;8:463-74. [PUBMED] |
3. |
Graham B, Regehr G, Naglie G, Wright JG. Development and validation of diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2006;31:919-24. [PUBMED] |
4. |
Goldfarb CA. The clinical practice guideline on carpal tunnel syndrome and workers' compensation. J Hand Surg Am 2016;41:723-5. [PUBMED] |
5. |
Atroshi I, Flondell M, Hofer M, Ranstam J. Methylprednisolone injections for the carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:309-17. [PUBMED] |
6. | |
7. | |
8. |
Yu G, Chen Q, Wang D, Wang X, Li Z, Zhao J, et al. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome assessed using high-frequency ultrasonography: cross-section areas of 8-site median nerve. Clin Rheumatol 2016;35:2557-64. [PUBMED] |
9. | |
10. |
Jeong JS, Yoon JS, Kim SJ, Park BK, Won SJ, Cho JM, et al. Usefulness of ultrasonography to predict response to injection therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med 2011;35:388-94. [PUBMED] |
11. |
Sucher BM. Grading severity of carpal tunnel syndrome in electrodiagnostic reports: Why grading is recommended. Muscle Nerve 2013;48:331-3. [PUBMED] |
12. | |
13. | |
14. | |
15. | |
16. | |
17. | |
18. | |
19. | |
20. |