Radiological Evaluation of the Styloid Process Length Using 64-row Multidetector Computed Tomography Scan

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Azin Shayganfar 1
Danial Golbidi 1
Maryam Yahay 2
Shadi Nouri 1
Shahrzad Sirus 3
1 Department of Radiology, Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Nutrition, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Background: As elongated styloid process is one of the causes of recurrent oropharyngeal pain and carotid nerve plexus compression called Eagle's syndrome and this length is not similar in different communities, the aim of the current study is to determine average length of styloid process by paranasal multidetector computed tomography. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study about 393 patients who underwent paranasal MDCT scan for trauma in Radiology Department without pathologic finding. Styloid length from temporal bone junction to tip of the process was measured using Workstation software. Demographic data including age, sex, and height were gathered from the patients' records, and patients were questioned about symptoms of Eagle's syndrome before trauma. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 with the methods of t-test, Chi-square, and ANOVA. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Two-hundred and sixteen males and 177 females underwent MDCT. The length of right, left, and mean length of both sides were 25.4 ± 7.3, 25.2 ± 7.8, 25.3 ± 7.1, respectively. The mean length of both sides' process was more among male that was statistically significant (P = 0.025 and 0.043, respectively). Right and left side styloid process' higher length was in correlation with patient's height (P = 0.002, r = 0.153, P = 0.029, r = 0.110, respectively) and number of symptoms (P < 0.001, r = 0.300, P < 0.001, r = 0.334, respectively). Conclusion: The mean length of styloid process was 25.3 ± 7.1 that was in accordance with some studies and different from others. Styloid process length is higher in males. The length of styloid process is in association with height and number of symptoms as well.

Keywords

1.
Kamal A, Nazir R, Usman M, Salam BU, Sana F. Eagle syndrome; radiological evaluation and management. J Pak Med Assoc 2014;64:1315-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Baig S, Patil N, Considine N. An unusual cause of recurrent throat pain – Calcified stylohyoid ligament. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2012;22:258-60.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Eagle WW. Elongated styloid process; further observations and a new syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol 1948;47:630-40.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Moffat DA, Ramsden RT, Shaw HJ. The styloid process syndrome: Aetiological factors and surgical management. J Laryngol Otol 1977;91:279-94.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Kaufman SM, Elzay RP, Irish EF. Styloid process variation. Radiologic and clinical study. Arch Otolaryngol 1970;91:460-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Lindeman P. The elongated styloid process as a cause of throat discomfort. Four case reports. J Laryngol Otol 1985;99:505-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Paraskevas GK, Raikos A, Lazos LM, Kitsoulis P. Unilateral elongated styloid process: A case report. Cases J 2009;2:9135.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Ghafari R, Hosseini B, Shirani AM, Manochehrifar H, Saghaie S. Relationship between the elongated styloid process in panoramic radiographs and some of the general health conditions in patients over 40 years of age in the Iranian population. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9 Suppl 1:S52-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Murtagh RD, Caracciolo JT, Fernandez G. CT findings associated with Eagle syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1401-2.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Cullu N, Deveer M, Sahan M, Tetiker H, Yilmaz M. Radiological evaluation of the styloid process length in the normal population. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2013;72:318-21.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Ramadan SU, Gokharman D, Tunçbilek I, Kacar M, Kosar P, Kosar U. Assessment of the stylohoid chain by 3D-CT. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29:583-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Yavuz H, Caylakli F, Yildirim T, Ozluoglu LN. Angulation of the styloid process in Eagle's syndrome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008;265:1393-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
Balbuena L Jr., Hayes D, Ramirez SG, Johnson R. Eagle's syndrome (elongated styloid process). South Med J 1997;90:331-4.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ekici F, Tekbas G, Hamidi C, Onder H, Goya C, Cetincakmak MG, et al. The distribution of stylohyoid chain anatomic variations by age groups and gender: An analysis using MDCT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:1715-20.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Basekim CC, Mutlu H, Güngör A, Silit E, Pekkafali Z, Kutlay M, et al. Evaluation of styloid process by three-dimensional computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2005;15:134-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Jung T, Tschernitschek H, Hippen H, Schneider B, Borchers L. Elongated styloid process: When is it really elongated? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:119-24.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
Advanced Biomedical Research
Volume 2018, May
May 2018
Pages 1-4