The effect of internal mesh fixation and external fixation (inguinal hernia truss) on postoperative complications in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty

Authors
Masoud Sayadi Shahraki
Mohsen Mahmoudieh
Behrooz Keleidari
Hamid Melali
Zakaria Sharbu
Department of Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Background: The present study evaluated the effect of internal mesh fixation and external fixation (inguinal hernia truss) on postoperative complications in patients with inguinal hernia. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial was performed on 64 patients that were candidates for inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic method following the totally extraperitoneal procedure. These patients were randomly divided into two groups. In the first group, the mesh was fixed with a maximum of three absorbable tacks. In the second group, the inguinal hernia truss was used as the external fixation for 6 weeks immediately after the surgery. Results: The results revealed that seroma, neuralgia, and recurrence were observed with the values of 6.4%, 19.4%, and 3.2% in Group A and 3.3%, 13.3%, and 3.3% in Group B (P > 0.05). Moreover, patients' pain scores 1 week and 1 month after the surgery in Group B were significantly lower than those of Group A (P < 0.05). However, the mean pain score of patients was not different between the two groups 3 and 6 months after the surgery (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the duration of return to work in Group B with an average of 8.07 ± 3.09 days was less than that of Group A with the average of 9.65 ± 5.34 days (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The mentioned findings can trigger the use of external fixation and an inguinal hernia truss as a support for the abdominal wall to make the dream of not using a foreign body in the human body come true.

Keywords

1.
Bruns NE, Glenn IC, McNinch NL, Rosen MJ, Ponsky TA. Treatment of routine adolescent inguinal hernia vastly differs between pediatric surgeons and general surgeons. Surg Endosc 2017;31:912-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Howard R, Thompson M, Fan Z, Englesbe M, Dimick JB, Telem DA. Costs associated with modifiable risk factors in ventral and incisional hernia repair. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e1916330.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Castorina S, Luca T, Privitera G, El-Bernawi H. An evidence-based approach for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: Lessons learned from over 1,000 repairs. Clin Anat 2012;25:687-96.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Majeed LQ, Surriah MH, Bakkour AM, Saaid AM. The use of prosthetic mesh in adult inguinal hernia repair. Int Surg J 2019;6:1745-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Białecki JT, Myszka W, Wysocka E, Sowier S, Pyda P, Antkowiak R, et al. A comparison of the oxidative stress response in single-incision laparoscopic versus multi-trocar laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2020;15:567-73.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, Jansen-Winkeln B, Gockel I. Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair – A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg 2017;17:55.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Darwish AA, Hegab AA. Tack fixation versus nonfixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitonaeal hernia repair. Egypt J Surg 2016;35:327.  Back to cited text no. 7
  [Full text]  
8.
Lockhart K, Dunn D, Teo S, Ng JY, Dhillon M, Teo E, et al. Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;9:CD011517.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Abd-Raboh OH, Hablus MA, Elshora AA, Saber SA. Comparative study between mesh fixation vs. non-fixation in totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty for inguinal Hernia. J Surg 2018;6:23-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Elango S, Perumalsamy S, Ramachandran K, Vadodaria K. Mesh materials and hernia repair. BioMedicine 2017;7:14-23.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, McFall M, Baig MK, Sains P. A meta-analysis examining the use of tacker mesh fixation versus glue mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 2013;206:103-11.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Köckerling F, Jacob DA, Chowbey P, Lomanto D. A meta-analysis examining the use of tacker fixation versus no-fixation of mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Int J Surg 2012;10:325.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Andresen K, Fenger AQ, Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Rosenberg J. Mesh fixation methods and chronic pain after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia surgery: a comparison between fibrin sealant and tacks. Surgical endoscopy. 2017;31:4077-84.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Zinner MJ, Ashley SW. Maingot's Abdominal Operations. New York: McGraw Hill Professional; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Tavassoli A, Ghamari MJ, Esmaily H. Repair of inguinal hernia: A comparison between extraperitoneal laparoscopy and Lichtenstein open surgery. Tehran Univ Med J 2010;68:168-174.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Strobbe L, Rosman C, Groenewoud H, Bleichrodt R. Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: A systematic review. Am J Surg 2007;194:394-400.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Bisgaard T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H. Re-recurrence after operation for recur-rent inguinal hernia. A nationwide 8-year follow-up study on the role of type of repair. Ann Surg 2008;247:707-11.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Li J, Ji Z, Li Y. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open procedure in the treat-ment of recurrent inguinal hernia: A meta-analysis of the results. Am J Surg 2014;207:602-12.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Magnusson N, Nordin P, Hedberg M, Gunnarsson U, Sandblom G. The time profile of groin hernia recurrences. Hernia 2010;14:341-4.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Singhal V, Szeto P, VanderMeer TJ, Cagir B. Ventral hernia repair: Outcomes change with long-term follow-up. JSLS 2012;16:373-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kalidarei B, Mahmoodieh M, Sharbu Z. Comparison of mesh fixation and nonfixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia. Formos J Surg 2019;52:212.  Back to cited text no. 21
  [Full text]  
22.
Tam KW, Liang HH, Chai CY. Outcomes of staple fixation of mesh versus nonfixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 2010;34:3065-74.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Desarda MP. No-mesh inguinal hernia repair with continuous absorbable sutures: A dream or reality? (A study of 229 patients). Saudi J Gastroenterol 2008;14:122-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
24.
Bona S, Rosati R, Opocher E, Fiore B, Montorsi M, SUPERMESH Study Group. Pain and quality of life after inguinal hernia surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing lightweight vs heavyweight mesh (Supermesh Study). Updates Surg 2018;70:77-83.  Back to cited text no. 24
Advanced Biomedical Research
Volume 2022, june
June 2022
Pages 1-6